WebMay 15, 2003 · Background and Purpose— This article examines stroke recurrence and whether the subtype of the initial stroke influences the risk and subtypes of further … WebHere, the administrative judge explained that he observed each witness who testified at the hearing and, based on the Hillen factors, 9 found that the agency witnesses generally were more credible than the appellant because they testified in a straightforward manner, were consistent with each other and the written record, and their version of ...

JOSEPH V. DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY, No. 12-3156 (Fed.

Webwhat are helpful, legitimate and appropriate factors to weigh in reaching those assessments. What is ‘credibility’? At its most basic, credibility involves the issue of whether the witness appears to be telling the truth as he now believes it to be 1. Involved in that assessment may be judgments about whether the witness can generally be WebDepartment of Army, 35 M.S.P.R. 453, 458 (1987). While bias is an important factor, it is only one part of a credibility determination. In this case, the administrative judge made proper credibility determinations. After weighing the Hillen factors, the administrative judge found Mr. Anderson's version of the events more credible than Mr. Mays'. cir threshold

Hillen & Roosen’s Post - LinkedIn

WebMar 27, 2011 · Under Hillen v. Department of the Army, 35 M.S.P.R. 453, 458 (1987), several factors guide an administrative judge in deciding which of conflicting testimony to credit. The AJ assessed the testimony of the female witnesses and Mr. Smiley under the Hillen factors, and concluded that the women s testimony should be credited. WebApr 14, 2014 · The three placement risk factors of sudden placement moves, multiple placement moves and child–carer alienation showed a significant association with mental health disorders. There was a strong correlation between the number of risk factors and the number of co-morbid mental health disorders per child (r = .67, p < .001). In conclusion, … WebHillen factors, 2 the AJ found Hudson’s testimony to be less credible than that of her supervisors and other corroborating HHS witnesses who overheard Hudson’s rude comments. We must accord the AJ’s credibility determinations deference, especially where, as here, they are heavily demeanor-based. See Griessenauer v. cir therapy